Colorado’s Tyrannical Secretary of State – Jena Griswold (Pass any or all information under this tab to as many as you can by any means)
By Jearell C Kelley, PE & Former technical consultant to the US Space Force (retired)

Texas’ Secretary of State released a report dated January 24, 2020 and signed by Deputy Secretary of State Jose A Esparza that explained why Texas rejected Dominion voting machines. The reason, “Dominion was not safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.”

Why is Colorado using Dominion? Answer 1: Our Secretary of State and Dominion needs access for vote manipulation.

Proof: Dominion is used in 62 of Colorado’s 64 counties. Tina Peters, an elected Election Clerk and Recorder in Mesa County until removed by Colorado’s Secretary of State, did a complete system backup of the EMS (Election Management System) before and after Colorado’s Secretary of State’s “Trusted Build” and discovered accidentally, via three subject matter experts, with decades of professional experience, of a second unauthorized database created and not all votes transferred to the second database. Those that were transferred are not confirmed to have the same original vote-selections either. The insiders can completely manufacture any election results they desire now. Tina also accidentally discovered the SOS’s “Trusted Build” erasing this criminal activity and other election records required by Colorado Statutory Law to be saved for 25 months.

Why is Colorado using Dominion? Answer 2: This fraud has been hidden from the public by a deceived, censoring and lying media for political purposes.

Fraud Evidence:

1) Go to TinaPeters.us, click on Reports/Filings tab and see the three Forensic Reports.

2) Then Colorado got caught, prompting non-citizens to register to vote. See link: “Colorado
        Caught Trying to Register Illegals to Vote” in the Colorado box under the States tab at
CensoredEvidence.org.

3) In volunteering with publicly available voter registration data in April 2021, I’ve found
phantom voters. A few examples are:

A) In my first hour, I was at a very small apartment complex in Colorado Springs. Surprisingly, five units did not exist. I can imagine one or two tenants forgetting what unit they were in, but would five forget and record the wrong unit? Are these real voters?

B) My relatively new neighborhood still has most of the original homeowners. Referencing the 2020 Voter Registration listing and asking my neighbor if a particular “registered” lady lived at his house, he immediately said, “No, she has never lived here!”

          C) Then I met a receptionist at a local business who said her mother lived most of her life in Oklahoma, didn’t know if she ever lived in Colorado, and died over twenty years ago. Somehow, she still got her mother’s ballot for the November 2020 election.

The free documentary “Let My People Go” at CensoredEvidence.org (See Censored Documentaries box on homepage) shows how phantom votes are manipulating elections, how some citizens are fixing it and that this problem exists for all voting machines in all 50 states. Citizens must also demand that electronic voting machines and mailed ballots, except to deployed military and the disabled, be removed from Colorado. Our sheriffs should be prompted to remove voting machines and bipartisan citizens employed to count, unless they don’t care for their votes.

The Bias of Judge Matthew Barrett, Tina Peters’ Trial Judge
by Jearell C. Kelley, PE & Former Technical Consultant to the US Space Force (retired)
October 6, 2024

Key Question: Is this the America you want to live in where your votes do not count, innocent people are put in jail, and county clerks are afraid to report on election fraud by government officials?

Oct 3, 2024 (9 min) Dr Frank’s Testimony at Tina Peter’s Sentencing (Note: The jury never got to hear this or anything on election fraud)

Oct 4, 2024 – Be sure and see this LINK: Dr. Doug Frank on Tina Peters and Why He Believes Donald Trump Will NEVER Walk into Oval Office as President Due to Deep State Tactics Now Underway

Associated Press writer Colleen Slevin reported that “Judge Matthew Barrett… ruled the defense cannot try to make the case about election integrity or Dominion.” (Note 1) This was obvious to anyone who witnessed his handling of this trial with even the most basic knowledge of cybersecurity issues. Tina’s defense team was immediately and constantly shut down multiple times whenever they got close to these topics with a serious final warning by the judge to defense attorney, Mr. John Case, if he attempted it again.

Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct under Canon 2 states, “A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITIES.” Impropriety is defined as the quality or condition of being improper or incorrectness. Despite the judges’ daily closing instructions to the jury to avoid any social content, it was obvious the judge had already been popular-media programmed or influenced with unscientific conclusions on election integrity or simply biased with incorrectness on this topic as measured against the latest non-partisan scientific research.

Scientific American, November 2018, article titled: The Vulnerabilities of Our Voting Machines, by Jen Schwartz, (Note 2) interviewed J. Alex Halderman who directs the University of Michigan Center for Computing and Society. Professor Halderman was asked, “Over the past decade how has the field of election cybersecurity changed?” He replied, “It has moved away from a position of hubris [“hubris” is defined as excessive pride or over confidence].” (It would be wise if major media drop their mistaken overconfidence too. It’s now obvious to those in the know that major media has not caught up with cyber security science yet. This constant publishing of falsehoods may be intentional. We will later address this.) Halderman continued, “Now that there have been major academic studies there is scientific consensus that [t]here will be vulnerabilities in polling place equipment.” Halderman also warned that “our outmoded and under-tested electronic voting systems are increasingly vulnerable to attacks.”

Professor Halderman added, “To my knowledge, no state has done any kind of rigorous forensics on their voting machines to see whether they had been compromised.” Fortunately, Tina Peters’ accidental discovery of voter manipulation now changes this record Halderman cites. Because Tina did a full backup of the EMS (Election Manage System) before and after Colorado’s Secretary of State “Trusted Build,” (a software update) Tina discovered vote manipulation. Tina was initially and only concerned with saving QR codes that could potentially be erased. Her backup did not capture how specific voters voted, nor did it capture personal identification information, nor did it expose hacking vulnerabilities as the prosecution tried to convey with their false claim of published “bios passwords.” In truth, as supported by subject matter expert testimonies, no such bios passwords were exposed. And even if they had been, the final instructions of the “Trusted Build” would reset this to new passwords. Why did the prosecution promote such falsehoods or prohibited the jury from seeing the captured computer screens of the supposedly “released” passwords? If this evidence was permitted, the jury could have seen the “published passwords” was a lie because it couldn’t be read. Please note carefully, that Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold was the first one to publish this falsehood. (All this should bring a serious ethics complaint against the prosecution (Robert Shapiro). It was obvious that their deceitful tactics range from confusing the jury to lying.) Dominion is used in 62 of Colorado’s 64 counties. The Colorado Secretary of State’s “Trusted Build” very likely erased this criminal activity of voter manipulation in the other 61 Colorado counties too. Mesa County is the exception because of Tina’s bold action to save election records. Tina’s attorney, John Case, said, “Thank God!” in his closing arguments. But did the jury understand his comment? Answer: Not at all, since all the damning evidence of Colorado Secretary of State’s and Dominion’s criminal actions were completely censored from them by Judge Matthew Barrett.

This connects well to Texas’ decision to prohibit Dominion in their state. The Secretary of State of Texas released a report dated January 24, 2020 signed by Jose A. Esparza, Deputy Secretary of State, explaining why Texas was rejecting Dominion voting machines. The Texas examiner raised concerns of efficiency and accuracy and concluded Dominion was not “safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.” (Note 3)

Why is Colorado using Dominion? Why did Judge Barrett prohibit the evidence of election fraud as reported in the three Mesa County forensic reports directly tied to Tina’s case that showed Colorado’s Secretary of State and/or Dominion creating two sets of election books (databases) and did not transmit all the votes to the second database? (Note 4) So, Tina was judged guilty on Count 10 for disobeying Colorado’s Secretary of State orders by permitting a person from the public to witness the “Trusted Build.” If Tina had obeyed, she would have broken Colorado statutory law of failing to preserve election records for 25 months, because Colorado Secretary of State’s “Trusted Build” erased this data. This absurdity shows Tina Peters is guilty either way if one only looks at the procedural “violations” as defined by Colorado’s Secretary of State’s instructions Judge Barrett only focused on, while Tina would later be discovered at fault if such records were demanded by the public for an audit. Tina, not Colorado Secretary of State, would be the person primarily responsible for the records in her county.

Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct under Canon 3 states, “A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF HIS OR HER OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY with section (1) states, “A judge should be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it. A judge should be unswayed by partisan interest, public clamor, or the fear of criticism. . .”

Judge Barrett was quick to reprimand defense attorney, Mr. John Case’s use of the word “lying,” but completely ignored prosecuting attorney, Mr. Robert Sapiro’s, use of the same word. Is this what an impartial judge does? For the judge to focus on Tina’s resistance to the Secretary of State’s instructions and ignore Tina’s statutory right to manage and preserve elections in her county, showed Judge Barrett’s partisan interest and bias again. This showed up again during Sherronna Bishop’s testimony who was also labeled a “Co-Conspirator” by the judge and without correction by the judge. Again, unashamed open bias by the judge. It was obvious that Sherronna was ready to report on the election anomalies she found in her canvassing that prompted her visits with Tina Peters, but her testimony was immediately shut down by the judge. So let me testify of my canvassing experience.

In April of 2021 I volunteered with the Election Integrity Plan. Our reference was the El Paso County 2020 Voter Registration Data that is publicly available. In my first hour, I was at a very small apartment complex on Nevada avenue in Colorado Springs. Surprisingly, five units did not even exist. I can imagine one or two tenants forgetting what unit they were in, but would five forget and record the wrong unit of a unit that doesn’t exist? Are these real voters? My relatively new neighborhood still has most of the original homeowners. Again, referencing the 2020 Voter Registration listing and asking my neighbor down the street if a particular “registered” lady lived at his house, he immediately said, “No, she has never lived here!” Then I met a receptionist at a local business who said her mother lived most of her life in Oklahoma, didn’t know if she ever lived in Colorado, and died over twenty years ago. Somehow, she still got her mother’s ballot for the November 2020 election. Would any of these not be classified as election anomalies and should they be brought to the county clerk and recorder’s attention as Sherronna did with her findings to Tina? Since I was finding these issues so quickly in a random search, isn’t that suggestive that the density of this problem is worse than we realize. This isn’t all I found and reported of phantom voters either. Note: Phantom voters create a margin to use in selecting the ‘right” candidate for those on the inside. This censorship of such evidence by Judge Barrett is prohibited by Canon 3, section (1) as reported above, because such censorship favors partisan interest.

By the way, while we were canvassing, the FBI wanted to prohibit our canvassing and attempted to pressure some states to shut us down. We were also lied about in the media that we were intimidating voters. (Note 6) Tell me, would you be intimidated if you were asked if you had any problems while voting? No one asked how anyone voted, which was another lie promoted by major media. We assured all that we would report any issues they had while voting. Some even thanked us for asking. The FBI messed up again when they discovered that the Russians did hack the 2016 election in a few states, but only reported to election officials in Florida. Shouldn’t every election official in all the affected states know about this? One insider attempted to alert others, but she was charged with leaking classified information and sentenced with a five-year prison term. What did the Russian hackers do? They got into poll registration databases and scrambled the data so poll workers could not verify the identity of registered voters. This forced election workers to fall back on manual methods, which created long lines outside voting precincts, since the election workers had not prepared for this. Voters in all parties, who couldn’t wait to vote, were disenfranchised. [Kill Chain – The Cyber War on America’s Elections has the evidence. (Note 7) The FBI, CIA, and DOJ attempted to publish Trump as a Russian asset, but Mueller, Duran’s reports and Nunes’ findings completely debunked the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, initiated by Hillary Clinton and the DNC.]

I invite the reader to ask the following question and record the answers they collect. Question: If my favorite candidate won by cheating did my vote count? Most said, “No” to me. But one person boldly said, “If cheating is what it takes to win, we’re going to do it, because we know we’re right.” With that I followed up with one more question, “Well, if my favorite candidate can ‘win’ without my vote, will he/she read my letters of concern?” (Note: I did not ask this question while canvassing, only with family, friends and sales people at my front door.)

Tyrants have no need to read any letters of concern from anyone, not even from their own party members. Because Colorado’s Secretary of State had her fingers all over the raiding of Tina’s office, including covering Tina’s office windows so Tina’s aids could not see what the Secretary of State’s team were doing, along with the Judge Barrett completely shutting down the defense’s approach to revealing Tina’s and Sherronna’s motivations, has all the stinking smell of partisan interest. Again, in violation of Canon 3, section (1) as stated above.

Since differences of opinion exist in all political parties, it is hoped that the media promoting confusion and lies on this issue wake up and support full open transparency, before they too are stepped on by the tyrants.

Canon 3, section (4) has, “A judge should accord to every person who is legally interested in a proceeding, or his or her lawyer, full right to be heard according to law, . . .”

Tina’s final and only permitted court comment was, “I have reviewed the case, the purpose of my testimony would be to offer evidence, the court has excluded (it), and therefore I decline.” As a witness to Judge Matthew Barrett’s handling of this trial, Tina would not have been permitted to testify of her findings of elections she was responsible for. This is a direct violation to Canon 3, section (4) as cited above. What more evidence must the public have to see that Tina’s trial was completely motivated by partisan interest?

Just in case the reader missed the latest news, Musk said a massive cyber attack delayed his interview with Trump. (Note 5) Professor Halderman already confirmed this in the Scientific American article cited earlier with, “Over the past 10 years cyber warfare went from something that seemed like science fiction to something you read about almost every day in the newspaper.” (Note 2)

The documentary Kill Chain – The Cyber War on America’s Elections, released in March of 2020, showed a DEFCON hacker wirelessly hacking into a nearby voting machine. The camera went up to the guys standing around the hacked voting machine and it was obvious, they were totally confused. This models our county election clerks’ confusion as well. They wouldn’t know what’s happening either. (Note 6) [I have personally heard Colorado’s Secretary of State in testimony at our Capitol claim that election clerks were in fear for their lives. Those in the know about election fraud are not blaming Colorado clerks, but the SOS. Is Gena Griswold pushing a false narrative?] The DEFCON wireless hacker then reported, “A person can drive by voting places, not look at the voting machines, change the vote and not be discovered, because no paper trail is left.” The Mesa County reports, Tina help generated, revealed 36 wireless devices in the election equipment. Do you honestly think our elections are not also being manipulated? If you want to protect your vote, see what other communities are doing in the free documentary “Let My People Go” in the Censored Documentaries box at CensoredEvidence.org. Sheriff Richard Mack’s Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association could also help. (Note 8)

At one point Judge Barrett admitted, “I may not be the brightest person.” Interestingly, we, Tina-trial-observers, had already made that assessment of him that he was in over his head. But it may not be his fault considering major media’s bias and continually bold-face lying on election integrity and Dominion. (Note 6)

Tina Peters, (69 years old) has just been sentenced for 9 years and is in prison now. The fraud she found exists in all 50 states. See free documentary “Let My People Go” in the Censored Documentaries box at CensoredEvidence.org for the evidence. Tina Peters is a hero, but major media is not reporting it.

Is this the America you want to live in where your votes do not count, innocent people are put in jail, and county clerk are afraid to report on election fraud by government officials?

Are we no longer the land of the free and home of the brave, but slaves to tyrants?

Please don’t do any physical harm to anyone. It would be much better to have our Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, Judge Matthew Barrett, and prosecuting attorney, Robert Shapiro, be sentenced with the punishment they designed for Tina Peters. They published Tina’s punishment to all election clerks in Colorado to keep them in check. Wouldn’t it be better if these people received the punishment they designed for Tina and that this is published to keep other corrupt politicians and bureaucrats in check?

If you remain silent, this evil in our state and nation will continue and grow. We will then be found living under hellish conditions as descripted in Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s short essay, Live Not By Lies. (Google it.) He explained why Marxist-style lies exists. People will say and do anything to preserve their lives and livelihoods.

Notes/References:

1) Associated Press title, “Colorado Clerk who became hero to election conspiracists wanted to preserve data, lawyer says,” by Colleen Slevin, August 1, 2024.

2) Go to CensoredEvidence.org and select the “Categories 1” tab, then the “Independent Testimonies of Election Fraud” box to get access to this Scientific American article.

3) Go to CensoredEvidence.org, select the “States” tab near the top, then scan down to the “Texas” box to get the official Texas report.

4) Go to TinaPeters.us and select the “Reports/Filing” tab for the three forensic reports performed by cyber security experts with decades of cybersecurity, computer and big data analysis experience. Brief resumes in those reports at the end Include:

(A) Doug Gould taught Advanced Forensic Techniques to State Law Enforcement, Military and major corporate customers at the World Institute for Security Enhancement and caught a foreign terrorist planning an attack in our country and was subsequently arrested by the FBI within 48 hours and saved lives.

(B) Jeffrey O’Donnell has over 40 years of computers, full Stack software, database developer and analyst experience. Had developed numerous “big data” analysis systems and is the President of Qest Development, a full-service software consulting and publishing company, and is Chief Information Officer of Ordros Analytics, which specializes in election analytics of all types.

(C) Dr. Walter C. Daugherity is a computer consultant and also Senior Lecturer Emeritus in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University. He graduated from Oklahoma Christian University with a degree in mathematics, and then earned master’s and doctor’s degrees from Harvard University, which he attended on a Prize Fellowship from the National Science Foundation. As a computer expert he has consulted for major national and international firms, and for government agencies. He helped develop the national computer keyboard standard and invented integrated user training within computer applications as well as various electronic computer interfaces.

As a computer science and engineering teacher and researcher, he has published 26 research articles from over $2.8 million in funded research projects, plus conference papers and other publications. He taught many areas of computer science and engineering for 37 years (32 years at Texas A&M University), including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, programming and software design, and cyber-ethics. At Harvard he received the Bowdoin Prize and medal for writing, and in 2015 was named a Distinguished Alumnus of Oklahoma Christian University. He is a life member of the Association for Computing Machinery and American MENSA.

5) The Epoch Times article titled: Musk Says Massive Cyberattack Delayed Trump Interview by Jacob Burg, 8/13/2024

6) It seems major media have this same problem of lying, cheating, and censoring. The Trump-Russia collusion hoax was debunked. Fifty-one Intelligent agents said Hunter’s Laptop had the marking of Russian disinformation, but later exposed as true, Wuhan lab leak first denied then exposed, Lockdowns and masks don’t work was finally revealed, the fact that Covid vaccines did not stop the spread of Covid was finally published, Ivermectin, with growing evidence of saving lives from Covid death if used early, was finally reported. Reported deaths from Covid vaccines are slowly coming out. Did you know Pfizer wanted to withhold Covid vaccine safety data for 75 years before releasing it to the public, but was overruled by US District Judge Mark Pittman? Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer VP with almost 30 years of drug safety experience, believes 500,000 Americans have died because of the Covid vaccine. Have some Americans become so selfish to protect their positions, money and power that they will lie and censor information to protect their private interest at the expense of others?

7) Go to CensoredEvidence.org, select Categories 1 tab, then the “Independent Testimonies of Election Fraud” box and scan down for the Kill Chain documentary link. This documentary also showed how the Georgia Republican governor, Brian Kemp, with very high probabilities, stole his position in 2018 and then took the voting machine (ES&S – Election System and Software) personnel into his staff. Should we wonder why he “won” again in 2022 with no changes to Georgia’s voting systems?

8) Sheriff Richard Mack – Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association.
Office: 602-268-9268, Cell: 928-432-1879, sheriffmack@hotmail.com, cspoa.org

Sheriff Mack and six other officers won a Supreme Court Case for State Sovereignty (MACK/PRINTZ V. USA) when they were at the same time threatened for arrest if they didn’t go along with the Brady bill. His organization would be great to confiscate fraudulent voting machines. His organization then needs the public’s support.

Are El Paso County’s Elections Fair?

By Jerry Kelley, The Peak News Citizen Journalist (10-13-204)

The free documentary “Let My People Go” shows how Tina Peters’ discovery of election manipulation is in all 50 states. Dr. Dave Clements, the productor, wants everyone to see it. It has no royalties for any group size (individual or large groups). I asked Steve Schleiker, the El Paso County Clerk and Recorder, in a private interview if he read Mesa County’s forensic reports, he said, “yes.” When began pushing for clarity as to their value, he pivoted to the charges against Tina and to the popular media claim that all of Trump’s court challenges failed. Law professor Clements debunks the media’s false claims. Count number 10 against Tina is for disobeying Colorado Secretary of State’s orders of permitting a consultant into Mesa County’s secure area to make backups, which Tina had full authority under Election Rule 20.5.3(b). The Secretary of State’s orders destroyed election records before the 25-month limit in all 62 of 64 counties where Dominion Voting Systems are used. Tina’s actions to perform a so-called “unlawful” backup of the Election Management System (EMS) was only to save these records in her county.

Question number 1: What crime is the worst – disobeying Colorado’s Secretary of State orders or complying and destroying election records before the 25-month requirement per Colorado statutory law?

Mesa County Forensic Report #3 proved that unauthorized databases were created and not all votes were transferred into them. Those that were transferred cannot be confirmed to have the original voters’ selections either. These criminal actions are connected to Colorado Secretary of State and Dominion. Colorado Secretary of State’s order to do a software upgrade, called a “Trusted Build,” destroyed this criminal action. Tina did a full backup before and after this “Trust Build” and accidently caught this election fraud. Steve Schleiker claimed to have read this report. Any citizen can read these reports. Go to tinapeters.us and select the Reports tab on top. The 2-page executive summary from report number 3 holds the criminal evidence.

Question 2: Why did Steve deflect to the popular media claims, instead of addressing the Mesa County forensic reports and explain why this is not a problem for El Paso County?

Texas’ Secretary of State released a report dated January 24, 2020 and signed by Deputy Secretary of State Jose A Esparza that explained why Texas rejected Dominion Voting System. The reason, “Dominion was not safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.”

I asked Steve, “Why is Colorado using Dominion?”

He replied, “It’s the law.”

Question 3: Is Steve Schleiker ignoring Colorado statutory law to save election records because of the Colorado Secretary of State’s bogus lawfare against a Mesa County election clerk who did? Tina Peters received a 9-year prison term from a trial in which her defense was constantly shut down on the election fraud she accidently found. You can go to westernslopenow.com, put in, “Tina Peters” in their filter and watch the archived court proceedings.

In response to Steve’s deflections, I commented, “Steve, your argument is not against me, but the subject matter experts who wrote those forensic reports.” Steve’s immediate response was, “I don’t care!” I was in the process of leaving and almost out the outer door when Steve turned to a staff member and said, “Call security.”

Question 4: Is it in El Paso citizens best interest to have a clerk and record who doesn’t care about major electronic fraud caught in another county and seems fearful of potential lawfare against him if he speaks up?

Question 5: Why did Steve feel so defensive and insecure with my questioning of him?

Associated Press writer Colleen Slevin reported that “Judge Matthew Barrett… ruled the defense cannot try to make the case about election integrity or Dominion.” Consequently, Tina Peters’ defense team was not permitted to show their evidence, which was Tina’s main defense.

Question 6: Why did Judge Matthew Barrett exclude any evidence? Did he not have even an ounce of curiosity?

Question 7: Were there any political connections between Judge Matthew Barrett and Colorado’s Secretary of State, Jena Griswold?

Question 8: Why did Tina Peters receive a 9-year prison term from Judge Matthew Barrett, especially considering her motive so save election records. Tina had been informed by a Dominion employee and by a Colorado Secretary’s staff person, that QR codes, which are needed to review past elections, would be destroyed with the upcoming software upgrade called a “Trusted Build”?

Question 9: Is Colorado’s Secretary of State’s actions an effort to instill fear into Colorado Counties clerk and recorders?

In a public meeting two days after my interview, Steve Schleiker mentioned that his mother always voted in person, while most others use drop boxes. No doubt it is old fashioned to vote in person. However, voting in person could have value.

The documentary “Let My People Go” shows how the bad guys, who are in both major parties, are watching the mail-in and early returns and adjusting toward their designed “win” with phantom voters. It’s best to have your mail-in ballot in your hands when you show up at your precinct. If told you already voted, show them your mail-in ballot and then complete an online criminal report with the sheriff’s office. You can’t do this if you just mail your ballot back or drop it off in a drop box.

Question 10: At that public meeting Steve Schleiker emphasized only what his local team is doing, which is to be applauded, but shouldn’t he be giving El Paso citizens further warnings on how to protect their votes as I just did? Since we “voted” him in, he works for us, not Colorado’s Secretary of State.

Question 11: Since Mesa County reports show this election fraud occurred multiple times and Steve was hesitant to talk about it, should we begin to question if Steve Schleiker was lawfully voted in?

Question 12: Should more citizens read the Mesa County Forensic Reports and file criminal complaints with the sheriff’s online reporting system?

Question 13: Should citizens begin to pass this information to others since major media and our own clerk and recorder isn’t?

You can see Mesa County Forensic Reports at tinapeters.us and select the Reports tab on top.

You can see the free documentary “Let My People Go” in the Censored Documentary box on the homepage at CensoredEvidence.org and the free documentary [S]election Code at tinapeters.us or at CensoredEvidence.org in the Colorado box under the States tab.

Want more information: Go to CensoredEvidence.org and select The Peak News tab.

Question 14: Should citizens remain silent while an innocent person is sentenced to jail for 9 years?

Christ taught that there will be those who ask him on their judgment day, “Lord, when did we see you  . . . in prison, and did not help you?  Christ answered, “Whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me. Then they will go away to eternal punishment . . . “(Selections from Matthew 25:45-46)

Question 15: Should Church-goers ask why their ministers are silent on civic injustice?

Question 16: Should citizens remain silent when a judge and election clerk-recorder seem more interested in their political positions than protecting the innocent as well as citizens’ votes?

Question 17: If citizens remain silent, should their rights be respected?

Question 18: If citizens fail to pass this warning to others, how are citizens going to protect their votes, rights, free the innocent, and stop wicked lawfare by those in power?